Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
sesiuni:virtualization-networking:session6 [2013/06/26 04:27]
freescale
sesiuni:virtualization-networking:session6 [2013/06/26 07:22]
freescale
Line 1: Line 1:
 = Topology = = Topology =
 {{ :​sesiuni:​virtualization-networking:​netperf_setup.png |}} {{ :​sesiuni:​virtualization-networking:​netperf_setup.png |}}
 +
 += Slides =
 +{{:​sesiuni:​virtualization-networking:​session6_network_benchmarking_.pdf|}}
  
 = Setup = = Setup =
Line 54: Line 57:
 netperf -H 192.168.0.2 -t TCP_MAERTS -cC netperf -H 192.168.0.2 -t TCP_MAERTS -cC
 </​code>​ </​code>​
 +Find out more about **netperf** at [[http://​www.netperf.org/​netperf/​training/​Netperf.html]]
 == Speedtest.net == == Speedtest.net ==
 Measure bandwidth and delay on links towards California and Spain Measure bandwidth and delay on links towards California and Spain
Line 100: Line 103:
 ip link sh dev br0 ip link sh dev br0
 </​code>​ </​code>​
 +
 +Display the offloading capabilities of the NICs
 +<​code>​
 +ethtool -k br0
 +</​code>​
 +<​code>​
 +ethtool -k eth0
 +</​code>​
 +
 == UDP == == UDP ==
 Measure the UDP bandwidth using the default send size (MTU). Display the UDP statistics before and after running the test for the host interface. Measure the UDP bandwidth using the default send size (MTU). Display the UDP statistics before and after running the test for the host interface.
Line 167: Line 179:
  
 = Traffic control = = Traffic control =
-On the VM, start **iperf_server.sh**. On the client, run **iperf_client.sh**+On the VM, start **iperf_server.sh**. On the client, run **iperf_client.sh**. Inspect its contents
 <​code>​ <​code>​
 ./​iperf_server.sh ./​iperf_server.sh
 </​code>​ </​code>​
 <​code>​ <​code>​
 +cat iperf_client.sh
 ./​iperf_client.sh ./​iperf_client.sh
 +</​code>​
 +What are the packet loss rates? How does it impact the VoIP and video calls?
 +
 +Let us apply Quality of Service. Define the traffic classes on the client side.
 +<​code>​
 +tc qdisc del dev br0 root
 +tc qdisc add dev br0 root handle 1: htb
 +tc class add dev br0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 1mbit burst 128k
 +tc class add dev br0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 40mbit burst 128k
 +tc class add dev br0 parent 1: classid 1:3 htb rate 5mbit burst 128k
 +tc class add dev br0 parent 1: classid 1:4 htb rate 3mbit burst 128k
 +</​code>​
 +Then classify the traffic.
 +<​code>​
 +tc filter add dev br0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32 match ip dport 8000 0xffff flowid 1:1
 +tc filter add dev br0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32 match ip dport 6000 0xffff flowid 1:2
 +tc filter add dev br0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32 match ip dport 21 0xffff flowid 1:3
 +tc filter add dev br0 protocol ip parent 1: prio 1 u32 match ip dport 80 0xffff flowid 1:4
 </​code>​ </​code>​
  
 +Run the iperf server and client scripts again. Is the packet loss reasonable?
  
sesiuni/virtualization-networking/session6.txt · Last modified: 2013/06/26 08:08 by freescale